In the past 2-3 years, the success of superhero movies has not gone unnoticed by the film industry. And just like anything that has become popular, critics have emerged to try to knock down the leader because it doesn’t fit their aesthetic of a good movie (Martin Scorsese) or now, and the reason for this post, because their own movies can’t get traction in the marketplace (i.e., make money/find an audience) anymore due to the shift in the audience’s tastes (Roland Emmerich). Now, I respect both Scorsese’s and Emmerich’s opinions–they are welcome to have different opinions than I do. I also respect that they are accomplished directors–in Scorsese’s case, one of the greats of the last half century. However, as a writer, I understand something that they don’t seem to for all their accomplishments–it isn’t just about the tale, but also about how the tale is told.
Martin Scorsese
Let’s take on Scorsese’s point of view first as it is the quickest. Basically, Scorsese loves the crime drama and I do not. There, simple. Now, of course, I’m going to complicate it a bit, but fundamentally Martin and I see the world in two different ways. I see the world as mundane and look to movies for fun, spectacle, and excitement. He sees the world as a “knot to be untangled” through understanding what drives people (especially criminals as he’s known for Crime/Gangster films). I don’t see the world that way, and I don’t like his movies (the worst movie I’ve ever watched is the one that the Academy gave him an award for: The Departed).
He and I don’t agree and that’s okay. We’ll (well, I will at least) agree to disagree. The Oscars thinks that his work is brilliant, while I vehemently disagree, but at least someone thinks he’s doing a good job, even if I don’t. However, he also wants commercial success along with the critical success without understanding that people don’t spend money, time, and energy to go to the multiplex to watch people untangle their problems. That’s like going to an amusement park and never riding the rides and only “people watching.” There are only a limited number of people who are going to find that at all entertaining.
Roland Emmerich
Now, Mr. Emmerich is a different beast. My tastes do often align with Emmerich’s tastes. So, then, why am I passing on his latest movie, Moonfall? In a word, not only is he using the same “formula” that he slams Marvel and Star Wars for with his own movies (Mr. Emmerich–you do know that the genre of the “disaster movie” is full of tropes that aren’t “original anymore” right?). However, he’s even “cribbing” from his own movies. Looking on IMDB, I’ve seen about 1/3 of Emmerich’s output and so, you’d think I would be the target audience for Moonfall.
Well, you’d be wrong. Just take a look at this review from noted critic Mark Kermode:
This review intimates that Moonfall is one of those movies that it is so bad that it has to been seen believed. Well, I’ve seen enough Emmerich movies to know that this one is not for me. After watching good sci-fi like The Expanse and Foundation, I’m not interested in “wavy-hand science” (as in waving the hand whenever what the director wants to do for spectacle doesn’t make science scientifically, but is waved away by pseudo-science/no explanation). I want stories that make sense. Star Wars makes sense (at least when Rian Johnson isn’t writing it). Marvel movies make sense. Heck, even DC movies (when Warner Brothers executives don’t interfere) make sense. Why can’t yours, Mr. Emmerich?
The second thing I’ll take issue with is that according to Grace Randolph from Beyond the Trailer (who looks at the business of movies) the polled reaction to the movie–it’s “Cinema Score“–is low: C+. It is very rare for a movie to receive such a low score because, according to Randolph in past videos, people paid for the movie and are reluctant to say negative things about movies they’ve spent money on. This is one of the lowest Cinema Scores that I’ve seen featured on her Movie Math videos (not the lowest, just one of the lowest).
This tells me that it isn’t Star Wars or Marvel that’s the problem, but the script. Having a “conspiracy theorist” as an integral part of the story is a “hard sell” for me (and he’s done it before with 2012, by the way). Add to that what seems like paper thin characterization and plot that exists only string together VFX sequences, and well, that’s a hard no–even for me.
You’re Not Obligated to My Time or My Money
Again, Scorsese and I just see “art” having a different purpose. And again, I’ll simply agree to disagree with his point of view. He can go make his “crime” movies and I’ll write my sci-fi/fantasy stories (& hopefully scripts). However, Emmerich has no excuse. Just because I like the genre of sci-fi/fantasy, that doesn’t mean that I’m going to give you a pass because you directed a movie in the genre. Like any other medium, you have to compete for my money and time by putting out a compelling product that I want to see not that you want me to see. In other words, you have to earn my time and money.
And based on what I’ve seen through the trailer and through reviews, Mr. Emmerich, you didn’t do that with your latest film. So please, for your next movie, look at some of the science fiction that people are enjoying (books, films, and yes, video games) and use that as a basis for your next movie/movies. If the trailers look good and the reviews are good, then, and only then, will I perhaps consider purchasing a (metaphorical) “ticket.”
It isn’t Marvel’s fault, it isn’t Star Wars fault. I respectfully submit that the fault lies elsewhere.
Sidney
Please consider supporting these fine small press publishers where my work has appeared:
- Read Skin Deep for Free at Aurora Wolf
- Read Childe Roland for Free at Electric Spec
- Purchase HawkeMoon on Amazon.com (Paperback) or eBook
- Purchase Dragonhawk on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
- Purchase WarLight on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
- Purchase Ship of Shadows on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
- Purchase Faerie Knight on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
Currently Working On (January 2022):
- The Runner (Fantasy Story–4000 words)
2022 Revision; Out to Market. - Unhallowed (Weird Western Story–4400 words)
2022 Revision: Completed; Out to Market. - The Independent (Science Fiction Story–4800 words)
2021 Revision: ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION