I often wonder if people will interpret my posts detailing the ways in which Sony and its Playstation brand is perceived as opposed to Microsoft and its XBox brand as simple “fanboyism,” bias towards the Playstation brand, and a perpetuation of the “console wars.” However, I want to assure you, the bias isn’t mine, per se, but simply a recognition that the bias exists in the general public, especially in the news/gaming media, which, while reporting the news, doesn’t do enough to acknowledge their own biases and the fact that they also make the news as well. I’ve found two differing examples with two differing (and well respected YouTube channels/review outlets) to illustrate how these biases display themselves and why it is important to pay attention to them and to point them out.
Exhibit 1: YouTube Channel–HDTVTest & Horizon Forbidden West
So, this is a YouTube channel that I followed for a while (approx. two years) and in that time, while I’ve noticed a slight bias towards Microsoft, for the most part, I felt that he kept his channel fairly “evenhanded” and produced a fair amount of content for Playstation (even going so far as to purchase 2 PS5s in order to test various settings. However, I started to notice things going a little “off the rails” (with me) with his videos on the PS5’s HDR display settings. When I tried his “method,” it didn’t look right and was far too dark. Moving to AVForums recommended settings for the TV and using the in-built PS5 setting “correctly” game me a picture more in line with what I was expecting. While HDTVTest has years of calibration and is certified, so too is the crew at AVForums, so credibility isn’t the issue.
However, what is the issue is that HDTVTest (for some reason) is unhappy with the HDR performance of Sony Playstation’s newest flagship game, Horizon Forbidden West as you can see in the following videos (which caused me to unsubscribe to his channel) in stark contrast to Digital Foundry who noted the inconsistencies, but found that they didn’t impact the overall presentation of the game in any significant way.
Video #1 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3pyEiLmOeM&t=170s
Video #2 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPMW4RqTR8g&t=10s
Now, I’m not sure what’s going on with HDTVTest who usually discusses televisions and only rarely jumps into video game/computer/console gaming areas (although he sometimes covers games in order to prove a point such as Fortnite and Dirt 5), but let’s say you’re an average consumer, who’s subscribed to HDTVTest, but not Digital Foundry. You might be PERSUADED to think that the Playstation lacked correct visual fidelity and not want to buy a game that isn’t visually “perfect” without understanding that this is actually a “PS5 Graphics Masterclass” (Digital Foundry’s words, not mine).
Exhibit 2: Game Informer & Elden Ring (specifically, PC Version)
The second exhibit is Game Informer and the new release of Elden Ring. Now, there has been a lot of hype for the Elden Ring game, so much so, that I question the impartiality of many reviews by many media outlets. Game Informer, in particular, is one of the media outlets that has been really “bullish” on this game since it was announced and just game the game a “perfect” 10 for its review of the game.
Game Informer Elden Ring Review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aUEN2iLtxY
Now, I don’t know about you, but when I hear that a piece of media (especially, a game) gets a “perfect score,” then I expect a perfect (or near perfect) experience in ALL aspects. From character, to gameplay (for games), to story, visuals, etc. However, Digital Foundry, once again, notes the strengths and weaknesses of Elden Ring, especially the places where the performance of the game simply isn’t up to snuff. While a personal decision, a couple of the Digital Foundry editors note that they are putting off playing the game until the performance issues are addressed on PC, and they also note the two ways in which console gamers can get the best experience (PS4 Pro version played on a Playstation 5 or Xbox Series X with a VRR display).
Again, I don’t know about you, but these compromises don’t indicate a “Perfect 10” score. At no point would another (non-hyped) game receive such a great score with a less than stellar performance on either the PC or Console. And it’s not just this particular outlet–last I heard, Elden Ring was the highest rated game on Metacritic, so there are a LOT of outlets who have “minimized” the performance aspect of the game simply because it is a game that they like and want to see to do well. While fine, outlets need to be transparent about this particular “bias,” acknowledge it, and then move on with the review.
Closing Arguments
Bias is one of the most important things that is a part of media that isn’t addressed. Many places claim impartiality, but either ignore/minimize their own likes and dislikes and don’t address them in any meaningful way. Forbes, for instance, has an implicit bias towards Microsoft based on many of their articles that (praise) Microsoft and excoriate Sony. Forbes‘ gaming editorial unit (based on wording of articles/way coverage is unevenly applied) would be very happy to see Sony disappear from the gaming landscape and to see Microsoft dominate (without noting the many negatives that Microsoft have introduced into gaming).
While I pick on Forbes, HDTVTest, and Game Informer for this post, this is endemic in the media and is a problem that doesn’t need to be–simply acknowledge your biases in the review (we like Elden Ring and want to see it succeed, therefore we aren’t going to penalize it for certain gameplay issues) or (we don’t like Sony and so we are going to penalize them for not being absolutely perfect on everything they do). However, no one either wants to admit to having bias in stories or that they actually are biased and would prefer one thing/outcome over another. Even with bias in their stories, they still want to appear as impartial as possible because impartiality (even false) aids in credibility.
Credibility is something that’s earned, not innate. If you’re not going actually be impartial (aka liking both Microsoft and Sony, for example), then please, stop trying to pretend that you are impartial. It’s not only disingenuous, but it also really kind of silly once someone starts looking at the language (negative and positive language) used in the story.
Also, if a game isn’t perfect and doesn’t play perfectly, then it really isn’t a “perfect 10” is it? No matter how much you like it and want it to be.
Sidney
Please consider supporting these fine small press publishers where my work has appeared:
- Read Skin Deep for Free at Aurora Wolf
- Read Childe Roland for Free at Electric Spec
- Purchase HawkeMoon on Amazon.com (Paperback) or eBook
- Purchase Dragonhawk on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
- Purchase WarLight on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
- Purchase Ship of Shadows on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
- Purchase Faerie Knight on Amazon.com (Paperback) or Kindle
Currently Working On (February 2022):
- The Runner (Fantasy Story–4000 words)
2022 Revision; Out to Market. - Unhallowed (Weird Western Story–4400 words)
2022 Revision: Completed; Out to Market. - The Independent (Science Fiction Story–4800 words)
2021 Revision: ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION